Ranked, not listed
Every finding carries a risk rating and a realistic timescale, so the urgent items are unmistakable.
Suitable and sufficient fire risk assessments, emergency arrangements and compartmentation observations for responsible persons who need a defensible position and a plan they can actually work through.
Under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order the responsible person must make a suitable and sufficient assessment and act on it. A generic assessment that lists hazards without ranking them, or recommends everything at once, leaves you no better placed than having none.
We assess the building as it is used, not as the drawings say it should be: how people actually leave, which doors are wedged, where the compartment lines have been breached by cabling, and whether the arrangements would survive a bad night.
Responsible persons in commercial and mixed-use buildings, managing agents, employers in occupied premises, and principal contractors managing fire safety on live sites.
Every report is written to be used on site, not filed and forgotten — prioritised findings, plain language and a clear owner for each action.
Every finding carries a risk rating and a realistic timescale, so the urgent items are unmistakable.
Plain language and specific locations, so the person who has to act knows exactly where to go.
Where an intrusive survey is needed to reach a view on compartmentation, we say so rather than implying assurance we cannot give.
Regularly, and always after a material change — a layout alteration, a change of use, a change in occupancy or a fire. For most premises an annual review with a full reassessment on change is proportionate.
The standard assessment is non-intrusive. Where the construction cannot be verified without opening up, we flag it as a limitation and recommend the specific intrusive work needed.
Yes. Fire safety during construction is its own duty, covering temporary arrangements, hot works, escape routes and the interface with occupied parts of the building.